Biofuels and Bioenergy: The Science the Energy Transition Cannot Ignore
Bioenergy is today the largest source of renewable energy on the planet. That single fact reframes a debate that is often reduced to solar panels and wind turbines. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), bioenergy power capacity reached 151 GW globally in 2024, and liquid biofuels alone are projected to account for 95% of all renewable fuel growth through 2030 — requiring an average annual expansion of 11% to align with net-zero scenarios.
Yet bioenergy remains one of the most technically complex and politically contested pillars of the energy transition. Feedstock selection, land use, lifecycle emissions, food security trade-offs, policy design — every dimension demands rigorous, interdisciplinary knowledge. That is precisely the gap that Biofuels and Bioenergy addresses.
Why This Book Matters Right Now
The policy environment around biofuels has shifted dramatically in recent years. The European Union's ReFuelEU Aviation regulation now mandates minimum sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) blend-in shares through 2050. The United States, under the Inflation Reduction Act, is offering up to USD 1.75 per gallon of SAF produced. Brazil has enacted its Fuel of the Future law (2024), requiring a 1% reduction in aviation GHG emissions by 2027, rising to 10% by 2037. India has announced mandatory compressed bio-gas blending starting in 2025–2026.
These are not distant targets. They are operational realities that energy engineers, policy advisors, environmental consultants, and academic researchers must navigate today.
Meanwhile, IRENA's latest World Energy Transitions Outlook calls for modern bioenergy to triple its contribution to global final energy consumption by 2030, while the FAO continues to stress the need to integrate bioenergy within agrifood systems without compromising food security — a tension that requires exactly the kind of systems-level analysis found in this title.
What the Book Covers
Biofuels and Bioenergy: Towards a Sustainable Future provides a comprehensive, science-based examination of the full bioenergy landscape. From the biochemistry of feedstock conversion to the economics of large-scale deployment, the book bridges laboratory knowledge and real-world application. It covers first-, second-, and third-generation biofuels; anaerobic digestion and biogas systems; life-cycle assessment methodologies; land and water resource considerations; and the evolving regulatory frameworks shaping investment decisions across sectors.
The scope is global but grounded — structured to serve both researchers who need technical depth and professionals who need policy-relevant frameworks.
Who Needs This Book
Energy engineers and chemical engineers working on biofuel production processes will find rigorous technical treatment of conversion technologies. Environmental scientists and sustainability specialists need this for lifecycle assessment and emissions modelling. Policy analysts and energy economists will draw on the regulatory and market analysis. University libraries serving engineering, environmental science, and energy policy faculties will find it an essential addition to their collection.
The book belongs on the desk of anyone advising on or contributing to the energy transition — at a moment when bioenergy has moved from niche option to critical infrastructure.
The Link Between Bioenergy and Climate Action
The IPCC and IRENA are unambiguous: achieving 1.5°C climate targets requires bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) as part of the portfolio. Advanced feedstocks — wastes, residues, and non-food energy crops — are projected to meet over 40% of total biofuel demand by 2030, up from just 9% in 2021. The transition to sustainable feedstock systems is not optional; it is structurally embedded in every credible decarbonisation pathway.
Understanding that transition — its science, its economics, its governance — is no longer optional for energy professionals either.
Explore the full Climate Change & Energy collection at CLNZ Books →
Key Institutional Sources on Bioenergy & Climate
- IEA — Biofuels: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/low-emission-fuels/biofuels
- IEA — Bioenergy: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/renewables/bioenergy
- IEA — Are Aviation Biofuels Ready for Take Off?: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/are-aviation-biofuels-ready-for-take-off
- IEA — Delivering Sustainable Fuels (Executive Summary): https://www.iea.org/reports/delivering-sustainable-fuels/executive-summary
- IRENA — Bioenergy and Biofuels: https://www.irena.org/Energy-Transition/Technology/Bioenergy-and-biofuels
- IRENA — Policies for Sustainable Bioenergy: https://www.irena.org/Energy-Transition/Policy/Policies-for-Sustainable-Bioenergy
- FAO — Sustainable Bioenergy from Agriculture: https://www.fao.org/energy/areas-of-work/sustainable-bioenergy-from-agriculture/2/en
- FAO — GBEP Bioenergy Week (sustainability & SDGs): https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/gbep-bioenergy-week-fao-sustainability-of-bioenergy/en
- IEA Bioenergy (Task Network): https://www.ieabioenergy.com/
Browse the Climate Change Catalogue →
Q&A
What are the main types of biofuels covered in current energy transition policy?
Energy transition policy now distinguishes between first-generation biofuels (produced from food crops such as corn and sugarcane), second-generation biofuels (from lignocellulosic biomass, agricultural residues, and waste streams), and third-generation fuels (from algae and emerging feedstocks). Policy frameworks such as the EU's ReFuelEU Aviation regulation and the IRA in the United States increasingly prioritise advanced biofuels — second and third generation — to avoid food-versus-fuel conflicts and reduce lifecycle emissions.
How does bioenergy contribute to net-zero emissions targets?
Bioenergy contributes to net-zero through several pathways: direct substitution of fossil fuels in power generation, heat, and transport; production of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) for hard-to-abate sectors; and — critically — through bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which can generate negative emissions by sequestering the CO₂ absorbed by biomass during growth. The IPCC and IRENA both identify BECCS as a necessary component of credible 1.5°C decarbonisation scenarios.
What is sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and why is it important?
Sustainable aviation fuel is produced from biomass feedstocks — including waste oils, agricultural residues, and in future municipal solid waste — to replace conventional jet kerosene. Aviation accounts for roughly 2–3% of global CO₂ emissions and has very limited electrification options, making SAF one of the few viable decarbonisation routes. The IEA estimates that SAF needs to increase from under 0.1% of aviation fuel demand in 2022 to around 10% by 2030 to align with net-zero pathways. The EU, US, and Brazil have all enacted mandatory SAF blend targets.
How does bioenergy production affect food security and land use?
Land and food security are the central tensions in bioenergy policy. First-generation biofuels produced from food crops can divert land and commodities from food supply chains, contributing to price volatility. The FAO and IPCC emphasise that bioenergy must be integrated into sustainable land management frameworks and prioritise waste and residue feedstocks to avoid adverse food security outcomes. Advanced biofuels from non-food feedstocks, improved agricultural productivity, and precision land-use planning are key to resolving this tension.
What scientific and policy frameworks should professionals use to assess biofuel sustainability?
The principal frameworks are: the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) Sustainability Indicators (FAO-led, covering social, environmental, and economic dimensions); the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) lifecycle greenhouse gas methodology; the CORSIA standard for aviation fuels (ICAO); and IRENA's sustainability guidelines for bioenergy deployment. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is the technical backbone across all frameworks, requiring consistent system boundaries, allocation methods, and emissions factors for credible comparison between feedstocks and conversion pathways.